CO129-508-5 Supreme Court of Hong Kong- slackness of registry accounting methods 28-10-1927 - 23-4-1928 — Page 142

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

142

Q:2

A:2

0:3

A:3

Q:4

4:4

0:5

A:5

Q:6

A:6

(c) Cheque for $500.00 dated 14.5.26. $300.00 was part of a loan to the Company. I only made one loan to

the Company.

(d) Cheque $184.85 dated 6.7.26 A/S. 897. This was paid to plaintiffs direct. (Distraint 404).

(e) I can't remember receiving this cheque for $3000. dated 13.7.26.

(f) Cheque for $1,000. dated 9.8.26. I had

advanced $1,000.

Some of the cheques were given for cash some were loans returned to me. I cashed the cheques out of daily

takings and sent the cheques to the Treasury. The Auctioneering Co. always came to my office to cash cheques. I thought some of the cheques were returns

of loans but I can't remember.

4

Why did you use Government moneys to cash the

company's cheques?

I didn't like to take so much cash to the Treasury

so I cashed their cheques.

How many loans did you make to the Commany?

Only one of $3,000.00, on 20.1.26. I was to get

11% per month interest.

Did you lend money to other people?

No. This money belonged to a friend.

Were you in the habit of cashing any other peoples cheques out of Government moneys?

Only for officers in this building. I cashed cheques for other business men besides the Auctioneering

Co. - men of substance.

Is Wong Fung Sek now in the Colony?

Yes.

Sometimes I see him in the Chinese Club. He

is no longer at the business.

60

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.